LA Sheriff’s deputies ticket PCH cyclists in clear violation of the law; LACBC demands fair and legal treatment

The law is very clear.

Yet somehow, the LA County Sheriff’s Department doesn’t get it. Or maybe they just don’t care.

Cycling in the South Bay’s Seth Davidson reports that sheriff’s deputies have been ticketing cycling groups for failing to ride to the right in violation of CVC 21202 — despite the fact that the law doesn’t apply on lanes that are too narrow to share with a motor vehicle. Like the right hand lane on PCH.

And despite the fact that they already know the law doesn’t apply, having previously agreed in a meeting with bike advocates to stop the practice.

Despite personal assurances given by Captain Patrick Devoren, assurances made in the presence of me, Gary Cziko, and Eric Bruins of the LA County Bicycle Coalition, the department has stepped up its illegal ticketing and harassment campaign against cyclists. Even worse, the captain and his deputies have targeted the Big Orange cycling club in a brazen attempt to use force, threats, and fines to frighten cyclists out of the roadway…

After being promised by Captain Devoren at a meeting in January that we would no longer be cited by deputies for obeying the law, the same abusive deputy — Deputy Duvall — pulled over David Kramer on June 29, 2014 while he was legally riding two abreast in the far right lane on PCH.

David was part of a 20-person contingent, and Deputy Duvall cited him for violating VC 21202, which requires a cyclist to stay as far to the right of the lane as practicable unless the lane is of substandard width or unless the lane cannot safely be shared by both motorist and bicycle. If these either of these conditions apply — and both did — cyclists are not required to ride “FTR” (as far to the right as practicable), and they are allowed to use the full lane pursuant to the section of the Vehicle Code that gives bicycles the same travel rights on roadways as motor vehicles.

Davidson goes on to cite additional instances in which riders were ticketed in clear violation of the law. And apparently, with the full knowledge on the deputies part that the law did not support their actions.

In one case, a rider even received a ticket for simply riding in the roadway instead of on the shoulder. Even though anything to the right of the limit line is not legally considered part of the roadway.

While cyclists may ride on the shoulder if they choose, they are not required to, and no law enforcement agency has the right to force any bike rider to do so.

And they know that.

As an attorney, Davidson has agreed to represent the cyclists on a pro bono basis. And asks for your help in defending their right — and yours — to ride in a safe and legal manner.

  1. Click here and select the “subscribe” (to Cycling in the South Bay) link in the upper right-hand corner. Your monthly $2.99 donation will be used to defray the legal expenses of defending David and Scott and to promote activities that oppose harassment by the LA Sheriffs Department.
  2. Email me at if you are willing to actively oppose this illegal harassment of law abiding cyclists. Activities will include letter-writing, phone calls, organized full-lane rides on PCH, and mass meetings of cyclists with the sheriffs department to demand that they stop their illegal harassment.
  3. Notify me if you or someone you know has been cited for a VC 21202 violation so that I can try to arrange pro bono representation in defending their citation.


Meanwhile, the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition has taken the fight directly to the top, with an open letter to acting Sheriff John Scott.




It’s also worth noting that Long Beach police chief Jim McDonnell, the leading candidate to replace Scott as LA Sheriff, has already agreed to many of the LACBC’s requests in responding to the Coalition’s candidate survey.

All of which serves as a reminder that the LACBC is LA’s only countywide bicycle advocacy organization, fighting for the rights and safety of all riders on a daily basis. No matter how or where you ride.

Which is exactly why you should support the LACBC. And become a member, if you’re not already.

Because as this case clearly shows, your right to the road is only as good as the people fighting to protect it.



  1. Great commentary, and thank you for the support!

  2. calwatch says:

    Bicyclists, and indeed all road users, should be aware of the Trial by Declaration provision in the vehicle code, which allows for all vehicle code violations to be adjudged by mail. The problem is that you have to deposit the fine first, which is an issue for those of limited means. But for those who can afford it, I highly recommend it, due to the ability to request an in-person trial if you lose.

    • Mark Elliot says:

      Before I could recommend trial by declaration, I’d like to know whether adjudication is handled by a judge or an administrator, and if the former, is more of a formality and likely to lead to a guilty verdict. That would require an appeal. And once a declaration is made, presumably the process requires no appearance by the cop – only a declaration – which might preclude his appearance in an appeal

      I’m no expert here, but it seems like trial by declaration puts the rider at a disadvantage in two respects: there is no chance of dismissal if the cop doesn’t show; and there is no opportunity to argue the fine points of 21202 to the judge if the issue does proceed to trial. Is it a sham process, like City of LA’s parking ticket trail by declaration process?

      • calwatch says:

        This is old, but to answer your question, the adjudication is by a judge or commissioner, and trial de novo is free and can be requested if you lose. Currently I’ve heard a majority of pedestrian and bicycle cases do not get declarations written. Also, as criminal cases pedestrian and bicycle infractions require guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Parking tickets are civil infractions and are just a preponderance of the evidence (50.1%). Trial de novo is an in person trial filed if you lose the TBD, and the cop has to show for that. Trial de novo is as if the TBD did not occur (hence the name). I strongly recommend TBD on all tickets, but especially non-moving violations as points on the driving record are not involved.

  3. Gary Cziko says:

    Video of the two latest incidents, along with selected transcripts, can be viewed at or

    Here transcript sections taken from the description of the video:

    Published on Jul 7, 2014
    Cyclist Harassment on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu by Los Angeles Sheriff Deputies Doug Duval and John Young, Jr.

    06/29/2014: Deputy Doug Duvall

    00:16 “If you guys ride anything but single file on this road you will be cited.”

    01:11 “Three deep is violation of the law, period.”

    01:17 “If I’m out here I’m gonna write the ticket and you guys are going to have to go to court. And I’ll tell you right now, I haven’t lost one yet. I haven’t lost one yet.””

    01:35 “I could have cited about eight people. I’m going to make an object lesson and you guys are going to continue on and do it the right way.”

    03:34 “When I see what you’re doing, riding three deep, that’s not going to be anything but illegal.”

    03:40 “You have to ride single file and you have to stay as close to the right as possible.”

    03:56 “I have the legal authority to give you an order on this road and if you fail to do otherwise [sic], I can take you into custody.”

    07/06/2014 Deputy John Young, Jr.

    Cyclist: “So what we don’t want to do is cause a problem, but it would be helpful to get clarification of where we should ride when there’s cars over here . . .”
    Deputy Young: “Ask, ask the judge, sir.”

    Cyclist: “Am I allowed to be in the lane when I’m riding back?”
    Deputy Young: “Ask the judge.”

    Deputy threatens to arrest cyclist when cyclist requests that it be specified on citation that he was riding in the middle of the RIGHT lane before signing the citation.

    Cyclist: “Where should we ride here to Will Rogers [Park] . . . ”
    Deputy Young: “To avoid problems you shouldn’t be riding on this road at all, honestly.”

  4. How does the CA statute on “Official Oppression” read? Because this action is clearly a violation of the TX statute (which is seldom enforced, sadly).

  5. […] Daily Ted. LA Sheriff’s deputies ticket PCH cyclists in clear violation of the law; LACBC demands fair and le… I wonder what the CA “Official Oppression” law reads like? Because this is a clear-cut […]

  6. Joe says:

    NOPE! LA Sheriff, keep ticketing the moron idiotic cyclists. Move your asses to the right. Law says “SHARE” the road, now as of this year, give them 3′. Most cyclists are idiots and deserve what they get. Swerving into the LEFT lane of PCH. Riding three wide instead of single file. All wannabe Lance Armstrongs. Go ahead and veer way out into traffic defying the laws just for your self absorbed attitudes, and see who wins that battle of “I’m right”. Idiots!

    • bikinginla says:

      You’re right, we are all required to share the road. However, that does not mean getting the hell out of the way of angry and impatient motorists such as yourself.

      Under California law, bike riders have as much right to ride in the roadway as you do to drive in it; more in fact, since your vehicle requires a license to operate due to the inherent danger it poses to others.

      Despite your apparent misperception, there is nothing under California law that requires cyclists to ride single file. In any instance in which the right lane is too narrow to safely share with a motor vehicle, bike riders may ride two, three or four abreast as long as they remain within a single lane; cyclists may also ride anywhere they wish upon the roadway as long as they travel at the same speed as the surrounding traffic.

      As for self-absorbed idiots getting what they deserve, you might want to remember that each one of those people towards whom you direct your bile are someone’s mother, father, sister, brother, son or daughter. It’s a pity that, like the Grinch, your heart is so small; we can only hope yours will grow one day, too.

  7. Anonymous says:

    You bikers are abusing your rights. You think you own all the streets of Los Angeles, but so do drivers. I’ve lived in this city for more than 40 years and I’ve never seen a city that caves in too much to abusive bikers like you. I wish more tickets can be issued out because I’m getting sick and tired of bikers, most of whom are out of state transplants who haven’t spent their entire lives in SoCal but are now invading and taking over our city streets even in areas that are not safe for bikers. So F#%& you.

    • bikinginla says:

      Dear anonymous — I was born in this city. Cyclists don’t own the streets, and neither do you. We’re just trying to get where we’re going safely and in one piece. And the reason our streets aren’t safe for bikers is because of drivers with attitudes like yours. Please visit your proctologist, and have your head removed so you can see the road, and learn to share it safely.

      Peace out.

Discover more from BikinginLA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading