Today’s post, in which I consider my attitude

Let’s talk about negativity. Mine, in particular.

You see, during the panel I was on at last week’s Bike Summit, I mentioned that one of the many reasons I’d started this blog was that I was concerned — okay, pissed off — about the state of cycling in Los Angeles. And said that this is, with the possible exception of 1980’s era Louisiana, the worst city in which I’ve ridden.

Then someone asked if I thought that cycling had gotten better or worse in my 30 years of riding — and here in L.A. over my near two-decades of residence, in particular.

My response was, worse. Much, much worse, in fact.

And it’s true.

Once I learned to avoid busy streets unsuitable for cycling — and to never, ever ride after an LSU home game, when the risk of being intentionally run off the road by drunken frat boys increased exponentially — Louisiana really wasn’t that bad. There were lots of quiet side streets perfect for cycling, and the River Road along the levee was wide, flat and virtually car free. And cyclists were enough of an anomaly in those days that drivers usually gave us a wide berth.

Every other city I’ve passed through or called home, for whatever reason or length of time, had a system of cycling infrastructure far superior to present day L.A. Even San Diego, circa mid-‘80s, had a better system of Class 1 and Class 2 bikeways (off-road paths and on-road lanes) than L.A. does today.

And in many ways, L.A.’s bikeways are in worse shape than they were 10 years ago, as crumbling asphalt, increased traffic and lax enforcement of bikeway restrictions take their toll.

Another thing that’s changed over the last 10 years is the willingness of local drivers to share the road. And in case you’re unsure where this is going, I’m not suggesting that it’s gotten better.

Maybe it’s the fact that traffic here on the Westside is significantly heavier than it once was. Maybe it’s the added stress everyone is under these days. It could be the distractions to drivers offered by the proliferation of cell phones, iPods and PDAs.

Or it could be the simple fact that L.A.’s understaffed police force, combined with an increasing population and shifting departmental priorities, means there aren’t enough officers on the streets to enforce traffic laws. As a result, local drivers seem to feel free to do whatever strikes their fancy, legal — or safe — or not.

And whether or not there’s a cyclist in their way.

So if that sounds negative, I’m sorry. That’s just my experience, from my perspective.

On the other hand, it’s not all bad.

Things actually seem to have gotten better over the past year. There seems to be less tension on the roads today than there was just a year ago. Maybe the Mandeville Canyon incident has made drivers rethink their attitudes.

Or maybe we’re all just trying a little harder to get along.

Then there’s the fact that even a bad day on the bike is better than just about anything else I might be doing. And for every negative moment on the road, there are a thousand moments that make it all worth while.

Some people at the forum thought that it was wrong to focus on the negatives. They felt that too much negativity might discourage people from riding.

And they have a point.

This sport needs its evangelists. We need people who will encourage beginners, and help them get the skills they need to start on a long, safe and rewarding riding career.

But we also need to talk about the wrongs we see and experience on the road. The things that can, and should, be changed, so that the people who start riding today will experience a better, safer and more bike friendly city than we did yesterday.

Because we owe them that.

 

One of my fellow panelists says it’s time to become a more considerate cyclist. According to Streetsblog, cyclists may finally be getting some respect in Washington. An economics professor at Oregon State University says instead of taxing cyclists, they should pay us to ride. An off-duty police officer in Tucson was killed when his bike was struck from behind in broad daylight; as usual, the driver was not cited. And also as usual, it doesn’t take long for the anti-cyclist rants to start. Another cyclist, also run down by a pickup truck, credits his survival to wearing a helmet; while this site suggest that learning how not to get hit in the first place is an even smarter option. Evidently, I’m not the only rider who complains about iPods on the bike paths. And finally, L.A. Magazine has added a postscript to their description of Los Angeles’ Bike Culture, discussing the role we cyclists may have played in influencing the outcome of last week’s primary election.

 

8 comments

  1. LisaNewton says:

    Today, I took a ride on Venice Blvd, knowing there was a Class II bike path there, but since I hadn’t ridden it before, I was surprised to see it was very wide. After my experience on Santa Monica Blvd, I expected something similar, but was happily surprised.

    I’ll be taking this route more often.

    Here’s to working to make things better.

  2. [...] Streets Not as Safe as They Were 30 Years Ago (Biking In LA) [...]

  3. Lee says:

    My friend Ray is my bike evangelist, he got me inspired to start riding to work from Santa Monica to Culver City. I cut down to Venice Blvd and ride that all the way…pretty much as safe a ride as you could hope for in this city. We still have to be very wary of texters, ipod drivers (wtf?) and the like.

    I stumbled onto this site a few days ago and after reading your “survival tactics” I’m going to buy a helmet and some gloves tonight.

  4. Gary K. says:

    We need people who focus on the good and the bad, both sides are important. I sat in on the LACBC talk on what they’ve been up too, and how many years of lobbying went into just putting some sharrows on the ground. We might finally have paint on the ground this year. 3.5 years to put some paint on the ground is unacceptable. In other news a 3 mile stretch of repaving the 710 is going to cost 75 million dollars, enough to have completely built out the old LA bike master plan that was never finished. We need people to get pissed off about things like this, our spending priorities are warped beyond reason.

  5. ubrayj02 says:

    LisaNewton,

    Just a heads up, a late-1990’s survey of collisions in Los Angeles between cyclists and cars, showed that the intersection of Venice and Lincoln Blvd and Venice and Abott Kinney were high-risk intersections – in the top 15 intersections in terms of reported bike-car crashes.

    I’d like to throw my opinion in on this topic too – I am motivated by anger. Cycling with my daughter on the roads of L.A. makes me hate those responsible for the poor conditions cyclists face everyday. No joke, it takes a while to cool off and not let the hatred boil over.

    It’s important not to let that anger dominate the pro-bike agenda. It is a great tool to get things done, but it can turn away a lot of potential allies as well.

  6. Donavan M says:

    I agree that being on a bike is awesome (no matter what!!) and I think that is why we get so angry/negative. We are bike junkies and when someone cuts are zen moment short (or deprives us of our daily dose of Bike-a-hol) we get just as agree/crazy as any other junkie out there.

    So if you want to be less negative just keep the drugs flowing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 + 8 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

%d bloggers like this: