Now here’s a project we can get behind.
The plaza would be build under the city’s new People St program, which is dedicated towards helping local residents reclaim underused roadways as public spaces. Oddly, though, some people don’t seem to get it, fearing that a turn lane allowing motorists to drive past their storefronts would somehow be better for business than a plaza that would draw people to them.
Which is a pretty good indication of just how auto-addled our city has become.
And even though it would only be built on a 12-month trial basis, allowing the decision to be reversed if it didn’t work out.
And if you live or ride in the area, it wouldn’t hurt to stop by some of the local businesses that would directly benefit from the plaza — whether they realize it or not — to encourage them to back the project.
Because you’ll probably be back a lot more often and spend more money if they just make it more inviting to come and stay awhile.
Meanwhile, a new Kickstarter project funds a documentary about a bike-riding comedian’s attempts to kickstart his comedy career.
After all, as the title of the piece says, what’s the worst that could happen?
More on the next year’s first Valley CicLAvia.
Streetsblog says the bike lanes on Grand Avenue in DTLA are getting even grander with an extension into South Los Angeles.
Most candidates for the Glendale city council oppose more bike lanes within the city, apparently preferring a return to auto-centricity. Meanwhile, both Glendale and Burbank failed to apply for funding to host an open streets event.
I love it. The Eastside Bike Club is hosting a Riff Raff Ride into San Marino, whose residents — some, anyway — worry bike lanes would bring outsiders into their overly exclusive community.
Redondo Beach’s Catalina Coffee Co. is recognized as the South Bay’s first bike-friendly business.
Downey joins the 21st Century by ditching a 1958 law requiring bike licenses.
Gizmodo interviews former LA and current Long Beach transportation planner Nate Baird.
In a closely watched case from the Bay Area, a teen driver who killed a Pleasanton cyclist and injured her husband while driving at 83 mph — in a 40-mile zone, no less — gets nine well-deserved years.
Surprisingly, though, he’s not one of the motorheads backing a San Francisco ballot measure to maintain automotive hegemony over the streets. I’m only surprised no one has proposed something like that here yet.
In a major disconnect, the US House Appropriations Committee calls on the Department of Transportation to cut bike and pedestrian deaths at the same time the House is trying to gut active transportation funding.
Good for them. Members of my old fraternity are riding from San Francisco to DC to raise money and awareness for people with disabilities, while People for Bikes rides on Chicago to raise funds and awareness.
A 93-year old Idaho cyclist puts safety first, and isn’t afraid to correct other riders. If he can catch them.
As usual, when bus, bike and car commuters race, the bike wins. Even in Des Moines.
What is it with self-absorbed young women who don’t seem to care about the harm they cause? In yet another example, an Ohio judge nearly doubles the sentence of a 20-year old driver who killed a cyclist while high on dope because of her lack of remorse.
A driver is charged with murder in a Louisiana cold case after police conclude the death of a cyclist was an intentional act.
A Clemson University study says people who ride bikes are happier than other commuters. But you already knew that, right?
It’s seldom a bike lane in Toronto if everyone else is parking in it.
A London neurosurgeon goes against the grain of the medical community by saying bike helmets are worthless.
But seriously, can he carry a goat?