This is huge.
For the first time I’m aware of, every major candidate for mayor of Los Angeles is on the record for their stands on bicycling issues.
Or rather, their support of bikes.
The Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition has managed to get all five leading candidates to complete an in-depth questionnaire on the questions facing the local cycling community.
And surprisingly — or maybe not so surprisingly, given the audience they’re speaking to — every one of the five has come out strongly in favor of bicycling as a key part of the city’s transportation future.
I’m not going to tell you what I think about each one. I’ve learned the hard way that it’s important to be able to work with the winner once the election is over — which isn’t always possible if you’ve come out in favor of his or her opponent.
But I will tell you that, from my perspective, two of the responses are head and shoulders above the rest — and not the ones I expected going into this.
I’ll let you read them yourself, and make your own decisions.
But you owe it to yourself to read each one before you cast your ballot next month or decide who to support.
You also owe it to me, and every other bike rider in the City of Angels. Because the future of bicycling in L.A. depends on who wins that election.
And that depends on you.
Here are the links to the surveys, in the order they were returned to the LACBC.
“Los Angeles should be a leader in innovative bikeway design and programs both for cyclists and pedestrians. I will pursue improvements that will elevate the bikeability of Los Angeles… I will build a network of separated and protected bikeways so that existing and new riders feel safe. This network will effectively connect neighborhoods to retail, educational and cultural institutions and we will start to see ridership grow.”
“Over the past few years, we have made great strides in making our city bicycle-friendly. From instituting new green bike lanes, to installing more bike racks, to parklettes, to larger initiatives like our bike plan—we are moving in the right direction. I would continue this momentum and look to leverage local dollars with state and federal dollars to see these initiatives expand tenfold throughout the city.”
“People aren’t walking or biking because they have to travel so far for food, work, and school. We need to focus on high impact investment in communities, so people can live and work close to their homes if they choose. If people’s needs are met close to home, they will be able to walk. Part of that investment needs to be in the quality of our streets. Some places in South LA, East San Fernando Valley, and the Eastside of LA don’t even have sidewalks.”
“As Mayor, I will approach cycling as a key part of our city’s transportation system. First of all, bicycles are already on our streets, and we must address that fact in terms of infrastructure, safety and planning. Looking ahead, our next Mayor must support bicycling as a viable option for short trips and as a way to link with public transit.”
“Disappointment surrounding LA’s transportation options generally, and the implementation of the city’s bike plan specifically, is understandable. Yet even with such frustration among Angelenos, our City leaders have failed to deliver efficient and effective transit… The days of poor planning, shady bidding, irresponsible outreach, failed implementation, cost overruns, construction delays, and the lack of a common sense approach to smart transit must end – and will end with my administration.”
………
………
Let’s give credit where it’s due.
These questions were prepared and submitted primarily by LACBC Planning and Policy Director Eric Bruins, in conjunction with the new Civic Engagement Committee.
And yes, that’s the committee I chair. And no, I don’t take credit for this.
It was a group effort, with Eric doing the lion’s share of the work.
And it’s a perfect example of why you should be a member, if you’re not already.
………
You can hear the candidates discuss the issues in Tuesday’s mayoral debate broadcast by KPCC. Streetsblog looks at the barely contested race in Council District 5, where incumbent Paul Koretz faces little known opponent Mark Herd; rule number one in L.A. politics is incumbents almost never lose. Agoura Hills considers expanding the Chesebro overpass and adding bike lanes over the 101 Freeway. Pomona Valley cyclists are invited to join LACBC affiliate chapter Pomona Valley Bicycle Coalition, which is celebrating it’s first anniversary.
Three former CA governors call for reforming CEQA. New bike lanes are on the agenda in Palm Springs. An Orange County woman rebuilds her face, and her life, nine years after she was attacked by a mountain lion while riding her mountain bike; a second rider was killed hours earlier. San Francisco cyclists aren’t happy with a proposal to move bikes off Market Street. If you’re in San Francisco tomorrow and Friday, you could pretend to be European for a video to promote Bike Snob’s newest book. A Chico cyclist dies a week after he was struck by a vehicle; he may have been in an altercation with the driver prior to the collision.
Instead of Safe Routes to Schools, why not build schools on already safe routes? Five apps for cyclists. A Tucson driver faces up to seven years in prison after pleading guilty to severely injuring a cyclist, fleeing the scene and tampering with evidence. A Denver driver who tried to blame his own brother faces up to 18 years in prison after being convicted for running a red light and killing a cyclist who was walking his bike in a crosswalk; he sped off with the victim’s bike still lodged in the grill of his SUV. Please don’t feed burritos to the coyotes on a Boulder bike path. A Detroit area town says no to a planned Gran Fondo. Austin surveys its residents following a spike in bike and pedestrian deaths.
The proposed World Series of Cycling is dead in the water; with a little luck, UCI president Pat McQuaid’s tenure will soon follow. Manchester cyclists can avoid ticket fines by taking a bike safety course. More proof of the international bike boom, as the number of Dublin cyclists has doubled in the last eight years. New Zealand researchers map the country’s cycling crash hotspots. A British expat builds a bike to filter Beijing’s choking smog while riding.
Finally, you never have to ride alone again.
“Rogue cyclists to escape fine with safety course”
This inflammatory headline suggests that these “rogue cyclists” are now subject to a different set of consequences for infractions than those rogue (and occasionally homicidal) drivers who are sentenced to traffic school.
Wendy Greuel’s response is the best of the collection. Eric Garcetti has a great record (as these things go), but his response is really lacking.
I read enough dog whistle style phrases in Kevin James’ and Jan Perry’s responses to be wary of claiming either would truly be bike friendly as mayors. I think they would appease cycling interest groups to the limit of our political ability – which is to say, they wouldn’t fight very hard for our interests.
Wendy Greuel’s responses seem to understand the political benefits that designing surface streets around cycling can bestow. The mayor is going to take some serious op-ed hits if the Bike Plan implementation continues as it has. The big drama of 30 second peak hour traffic slowdowns to install a bike lane on major streets has yet to be played out across the pages of the LA Times – but evidence from every local blog that has covered the issue shows that even an infinitesimal increase in peak hour commute times due to a bike lane installation will be met with shrieking insanity by the anonymous lumpen car commuters of LA.
[…] set the gold standard in presenting all the information, links and more. Check out his blog & the original article. […]
[…] Biking in L.A. Asks Who Wrote Best Answer to LACBC Mayoral Survey…Greuel Winning […]
Kevin James really seems to have a technological solution to everything! Lights on parking meters to warn cyclists of recently parked cars, new construction techniques to repair roads more cheaply, and a network of underground electrified tunnels to move goods from the port.
I was also expecting something much better from Garcetti. If we can trust these responses, then Gruel is the only one who gets it, Not only did she say ‘protected’ bike lanes 3 times, including before being asked about them, but no one else mentions it even once, even though one of the questions is specifically about them. Garcetti, when asked about protected lanes, points with pride to sharrows – yikes.